Saturday, October 14, 2006
Orbit TrapA Blog about Fractal Art
" "
Contributors
Tim HodkinsonTerry Wright
Links
- More from Tim:
- Art from Pushing Buttons and Turning Dials
- More from Terry:
- Blog with a View
- Rooms with a View
Previous Posts
- There are no real things to be seen there...
- Retrospective (Part Two) - An Affair With Popcorn
- Fifteen Minutes
- Inky Blue
- Oppression
- Raskh
- India Ink-194.8bf
- Retrospective (Part One)
- Three Faces of Pi
- Cult of the Microbe King
Comments Policy
Comments are moderated, but only to weed out the idiotic, harassing and simply hostile. If you're one of those, send us an email instead.© 2006-2009
All content is copyrighted by its respective author and cannot be reproduced without their permission
4 Comments:
I like the elaborate treasure map look. It looks good inverted (negative) too. I copied it to the clipboard and tried a few things.
I can see why Max Ernst would get excited over this sort of thing. It really is an automatically created landscape, if the viewer takes the time to look a little closer and overlook it's humble origins.
I would call this algorithmic because the main characteristics of the image are a product of the process, or procedure, although it can be modified in minor ways by the artist (or should we say scientist?).
Could it be said that this is a natural fractal image? I don't know enough about fractal theory to say for sure, but it looks so much like the things I often see in fractal generators.
10/14/2006 12:53 PM
I wouldn't call it "algorithmic", but perhaps it is "procedural", if you need to give it a label.
It definitely shows fractal properties, and if "official" confirmation is need, decalcomania is specifically mentioned in this paper co-authored by Mandelbrot.
10/15/2006 6:48 AM
Mark,
Could you clarify for me what this image is - is it an Ernst study (if it is, I'm not familiar with it)? Is it your work? How was it made? Or maybe it's some joke I'm not getting?
10/15/2006 2:25 PM
It's my own "work". An example of decalcomania
10/15/2006 4:57 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home